Muy interesante la cantidad de tips necesarios para fomentar la participación de los alumnos y mantener el interés. Algunas muy simples y sencillas pero que son excelentes instrumentos a aplicar. Es interesante como podemos “ver y conocer” a nuestros estudiantes a través de las estrategias u herramientas de participación que utilizamos
In this module I learned how to work with different student profiles considering synchronous and asynchronous work. Nice tools.
When anyone talks about learning styles, the first thing that comes to mind is the Kolb cycle and the four main learning styles. I always thought that learners have one main learning style, and I enjoyed learning about Bergquist and Phillips's proposal of the different learning styles.
Great information about synchronous and asynchronous learning and how to conduct them, definitely was helpful. I also found valuable the discussion on one on one feedback.
Feedback is key to ensure everyone is on the same page towards excellence
Asynchronous discussions offer advantages for student participation that they may not always have with synchronous discussions, such as time to develop their inputs. Be sure to provide your instructor feedback that summarizes the student's discussions. When using synchronous discussions, set a time limit and ensure to keep students on topic.
Engaging learners can help the instructor to gauge the level of understanding of each learner, which can be used to self-reflect on strategies being used to deliver information and continue to engage the students. Synchronous discussions can be useful one on one but shouldn't be relied on for multiple students or delivering important information. Student engagement starts with the instructor, it's the instructor's responsibility to lead by example.
Initiating an asynchronous discussion post allows students to post at their leisure and exchange information with other students in the class.
This module focused on engaging students through different communication methods. There are asynchronous and synchronous discussions along with providing timely and supportive feedback. These methods assist in keeping our e-learners engaged in the course.
I found it interesting that asynchronous is found to be more informative than synchronous. Whereas, synchronous should be in small groups no more then 6 participants for no more then 30 minutes.
Even when the response of the student is less than expected, keep your reply to them supportive and encourage them to do better. Let them know that they did a good job or excellent job. Encouragement keeps them wanting to participate and learn.
Providing feedback is very helpful to students' progress
Asynchronous discuss is effective to monitor students learning but not in all students.
Feedback builds confidence and encourages students to continue to meet course objectives.
I've learned in this module that asynchronous does not happen simultaneously, so that it could be teaching a class and then providing that class at a later time under another structured concept, so the instructor lead. Or synchronous means that it happens in real-time so that somebody can attend the class or view the course from the camera online. Some of the disadvantages are the scheduling of the students across different time zones as well as text screen chat advance, and analyzing some reason individual students and put through a chat session versus being Able to verbalize that insight. Look at the three types of students avoiding too competitive, too dependent students, each one of them will struggle a little bit Bergquist a handout faculty development.
Understanding your curriculum’s value and weight is essential, and deciding whether asynchronous or synchronous is the best way to develop it. The discussion through the dictionary of the primary cause of preparation can determine the outcome in some grades volumes below the expected standards. It's best to identify the learners that are not active participants within the class to challenge them more directly to get them more involved in the course.
Staying engaged in your online courses helps to keep students engaged. Grading timely and participating in discussions helps. Motivating and letting students know what is going well helps. I also know from personal experience providing some constructive ideas lets students know that you have truly looked at their work.
Differences between synchronous and asynchronous discussions. That student participation and interactions is very beneficial for the students.
Asynchronous discussion forums allow users to read and critically think through their answer to a question, then type their answer and re-read it to ensure that he or she is relating the information intended. This also gives shy users or those with language barriers and slow readers time to reflect on the discussion and what is actually being asked before posting a reply. This, in turn, encourages those users to participate whereas a synchronous discussion may move too quickly and deter those users from participation.
I liked the part on small group discussions.
Comment on Edric Leggett's post:
Hi Edric. It is interesting how these inhibitory styles are often blind spots to learners while being so obvious to others. It will take careful focus to inspire the "avoidant" learner to get involved.
One of the more difficult aspects of teaching - in-person or online - is getting learners to accept feedback that can influence future responses. First, to be effective, feedback needs to be rather prompt when the issue is still present in learners' minds. Even so, humans do not generally like to hear corrective comments. The instructor-learner relationship needs to be established so that guidance can be accepted. Learners need to be taught how to offer effective peer feedback. This could lead to self-analysis which is the likely the best feedback.
