It is important to use several methods of feedback including student feedback and self-feedback.
It is important to reflect on the effectiveness of the course. This is performed through multiple evaluations from different sources.
Students are one of the three Key Stakeholders in an Online Course, and their Feedback and input should be taken into consideration when making revisions to the Online Course.
There will have to be a variety of ways in which I evaluate the studnets. I like the idea of having a peer review my course.
It is important to gather data from multiple sources when evaluating your course. Using both quantitative and qualitative measures is the ideal way to get the best overall picture of how effective your course is. Different types of data fit best with the different stakeholders in the course outcomes.
The new evaluation methods I have really taken away from this is the Question Tools... Three clear points, three muddy points. I was thinking they would make a great discussion board posting to count towards attendance.
Evaluations are very beneficial in the beginning, middle and end of the course. Evaluations can be used help an instuctor see what areas students need to focus on or what areas the instructor need to focus on.
The use of multiple evaluations is important to review and improving courses.
Various types of evaluations are necessary when reviewing a course
Course revision requires multiple facets of differing information to be the most successful. In addition to this, action research is a good process to use to fully understand the possible courses of action to take.
I'm going to now implement multiple evalutions. That way my students can learn alot more effectively
I have learned the importance of utilizing multiple resources when designing a course. To apply this knowledge I will incorporate information from the most up to date peer reviewed literature into assignment and lesion designs.
The best way to improve anything is to not only enlist the feedback of your students, but also other avenues in order to provide the highest quality course as possible. Having multiple opinions allows you to get the most well rounded course as possible.
The take - way from this session is to use multiple evaluations when closing the loop. In addition, a concerted effort will be made to encourage students to complete surveys at the end of end course.
in order to make the correct changes when revising your course it is essential to have multiple resouches and multiple methods as part of the new changes.
Peer evalation is only one way ( out of many) to evaluate the course and student outcomes.
I like the idea of multiple evaluations of the learning.
Taking the time to revise your course is critial for the learners. Making sure you information is up to date is important. Fixing any mistakes, misleading informations, seeing if you can teach or word a concept in a more efficent way. All important steps that need to happen in order to ensure students are learning. Testing your students knowledge of the information in the course is so important. I hated when a teacher would give us one large test at the end and we had to remember it all instead of little test along the way. It important to have knowledge tester break spots to make sure students are not failing behind with the information.
Self evaluation of many methods are helpful for revising the course. I would more inclined to pay attention to pre/postest in a way to evaluate and gain more feedback from students to continue a more tailored revision for the students
