Feedback from multiple steakholders is critical to making course revisions.
Multiple evaluations are essential to providing a good picture of how the course is running. Evaluations from different points of view would allow me to fine-tune my course to the benefit of all.
I like the discussion regarding student assessment using "the muddiest point". This will assist me in evaluating students learning and my teaching effectiveness.
Using mulitple evaluation methods are important to course revision and to improve success.
There are a variety of ways to evaluate students. It is recommended to use a variety of them because of the multiple intelligence.
Course Assessment Plan (formative and summative) requires effective use of a course rubric, self- and peer-assessment, and gathering and use of meaningful feedback.
At this point multiple evaluations makes the most sense since, it gives different types of learners a meaningful evaluation on their learning curve and since the students are distant learners they need the extra input.
There are multiple venues of feedback that I can use to challenge and improve my teaching skills. Peer review, student review, and qualitative studies can help direct me in paths to move forward towards an exemplary learning experience for my students.
That course revision is a multifaceted process and is ongoing.
It takes multiple tools to provide the appropriate feedback you want to make continuous changes to improve your online course.
The multiple aspects to review when evaluating a course are important. Faculty are generally evaluated by how many students succeed and how many fail. However, all learning activities and methods of evaluation must be considered.
3 clear and 3 muddy concepts in a 1 minute evaluation is an interesting tool I may try.
It is important to use several methods of feedback including student feedback and self-feedback.
It is important to reflect on the effectiveness of the course. This is performed through multiple evaluations from different sources.
Students are one of the three Key Stakeholders in an Online Course, and their Feedback and input should be taken into consideration when making revisions to the Online Course.
There will have to be a variety of ways in which I evaluate the studnets. I like the idea of having a peer review my course.
It is important to gather data from multiple sources when evaluating your course. Using both quantitative and qualitative measures is the ideal way to get the best overall picture of how effective your course is. Different types of data fit best with the different stakeholders in the course outcomes.
The new evaluation methods I have really taken away from this is the Question Tools... Three clear points, three muddy points. I was thinking they would make a great discussion board posting to count towards attendance.
Evaluations are very beneficial in the beginning, middle and end of the course. Evaluations can be used help an instuctor see what areas students need to focus on or what areas the instructor need to focus on.
The use of multiple evaluations is important to review and improving courses.
