Public
Activity Feed Discussions Blogs Bookmarks Files

It is important to use multiple evaluation methods from all stakeholder groups to make necessary adjustments to the course to improve student learning. 

 

Revising and adapting your course is important. Sometimes we don't realize what will work until we try.

 

Revision of a course is an ongoing process. This will prevent the class from getting outdated and keep new ideas and methods current. Updates should be incorporated using multiple sources.

It is important for teachers to have multiple evaluations throughout the course to give good, detailed feedback. 

Having multiple evaluations of your course is most helpful, and student evaluations shouldn't be your sole resource for revising your modules. 

I find you need multiple evaluations, I think you also have the way the evaluation is done.

Multiple evaluations are important 

There are so many more tools than the "Student Survey" I have been using. I like the "Peer Review" concept which would do the same thing for us as teachers as it does for students, make us reflect on what we have done.

Multiple online stakeholders are needed to evaluate your online course. Both quantitative and qualitative data are necessary to evaluate. Peer evaluation and feedback can impact your online course by identifying strong and weak areas of communication with students. Evaluation is crucial to making the online course better and better. Outside resources can assist with assessing students.

Using student portfolios as a way to determinie what the students think is important, regarding learning indie the classroom.  We have portfolios that the students complete.

There needs to be multiple ways to evaluate students. This allows us to know what a student knows and a clear picture of what they need support with. 

Evaluation of the course needs to be from multiple sources and ongoing to be effective

 

I need to utilize multiple methods of evaluation when it comes to revising the design of a course.  Student evaluations are not enough to base changes upon.

 

It was important to know that course assessments need to be completed by more than just students.

Learned the importance of creating multiple evaluations.

Overall excellent ideas and practical application of course evaluation theory as well as every day technique. Great defintions of quantitative data versus qualitative data and using multiple forms and types of data when evaluating courses, your own (teacher / instructor) performance and the overall ability of your course or program to accomplish it's most important goal: Helping the student! 

More data and more ways of evaluating something is always going to be better in the long run, so yes use all the data and quality resource to evaluate the course is needed.

Course revision is an ongoing process, using multiple sources of assessment and feedback to determine how best to revise the course.

 

Revision and improvement are functions of a variety of types and sources of data.  Using the quantitative data to inform the qualitative data can lead to a rich understanding of both what outcomes look like and why they appear this way.  This information is then used to make course improvements.

 

It is important to use a variety of evaluations from various sources in evaluating and editing course content and design.

 

Sign In to comment