Rubrics are an important part of communication and should be given at the time of the assignment to better communicate the expectations for the project.
When entering grades I use the Rubrics and give them feedback on their discussion and or any assignment
It is essential to manage discussions effectively. The first discussion post should introduce students to each other. Guidelines for what is expected for postings, how often they occur, and the duraton of the discussions should be posted. Instructors should not be too quick to provide correct answers or intervene in a way that prevents students from thinking things through annd discussing them for thmselves. Rubrics are an effective tool for clear and fair grading and may include format, contribution, justification and responses to the posts of others.
Creating a guideline so you do not have low-quality posting, having a healthy community by having students feel comfortable communicating with their peers, collabotayion with other teachers can help with learning how to facilitate so you become the "guide on the side," and using communication and collaboration to develop the learning process.
This module focuses on the importance of a ruric. I have always used rubrics and this reinforces my decision to do so. Rubrics make the directions clear to the student and allow for precise feedback to the student.
Having a rubric allows for constructive feedback and consistency from the instructor
Rubrics provide students a framework for assignments and a basis for instructors to grade those assignments.
A discussion board should have the same framework as a discussion in class. I use the "no hogs, no logs" for in class discussions to make sure there is a balance of opinion in the discussion.
I learned that rubrics can serve as a very useful tool with online learning. Students should already be famiilar with rubrics and once explained, they should know the teacher's expectations when posting in discussion boards. It reminds me of my experience with obtaining my degrees via distant learning.
I have learned the importance of using a rubric and how to design a rubric that will best suit the assignment and the evaluation of the students' progress.
Rubrics are great when providing feedback to students.
Teachers must provide clear and concise space for communication. Provide consistency and provide a clear rubric. Do not give the answers just to get to the next assignment.
In this final module, I learned effective online facilitation should engage, guide, and motivate learnerss, and provide a safe and conducive environment for learning. Therefore, criteria must used as the basis of a framework for measuring growth-- rubrics are a key component and assessment tool-- and provides the instructors with the opportunity to assess students' work consistently and more easily.
Communication, collaboration, and rubrics allow for learners to better understand the outcomes desired.
I found the "guide on the side" points to be beneficial. To remember that teaching online has some very different techniques vs. F2F teaching. Also, about how to build the online community.
Having a rubric can help you be consistent in providing feedback.
Set specific rules and requirements for the students. This can also include students writing and grammar in their discussions/posts and blogs.
I have stated this in previous posts, but rubrics are key here. The students need to know how they are being evaluated and a rubric can provide that. Not only will it give the students the information that they are needing, but it gives the instructor a consistent way to assess each of the students and provide them with meaningful feedback.
Personalization helps to provide a face to discussions and enhances a sense of community. Online Rubrics are essential.
Communication and collaboration work together to deepen knowledge. I liked the use of rubrics and peer evaluation. I am left with a question (from my own personal experience) as to how are students prepared to deal with a member of their team who refuses to show up, or not follow through on their contribution to the project? Peer evaluation may be one way to allow students to express their disappointment, and yet how is that communicated respectfully and positively? Also, if the project is graded, do all suffer for the lack of contribution by one?
