I learned to establish differences between assessment and evaluation.
New learning for me was the three types of diagnostic assessment, 1) pre-test, 2) muddiest point, and 3) the 1-2-3 list.
It is important to understand the difference between assessment and evaluation as they are critical components to the learning and teaching process. As instructors continually develop assessments and evaluate students, distinguishing between the two enhances the process of assessing and judging student learning.
Having different assessment styles can enhance the learning that takes place.
It is crucial to ensure that, as an instructor, assessments happen alongside evaluations. It is not enough to evaluate and grade a student; instructors must also assess what is working and not working, what students are grasping and not grasping.
I like the prompt "If I were to ask you to do _________, what is the one thing you would not know how to do?" It's evocative and gets them thinking about what they would need to actually do it, before I just spoon feed it to them. It also allows me to recognize beginner mind in things I have decades of experience doing. It can be hard to remember what you don't know when you're first starting out.
I have learned that is important to think about the type of assessment I am giving to my students. I will categorize my assessments in the future to make sure I am conducting the correct type of assessment for the outcome I desire.
This course has been great as far as explaining how to know the difference between assessment and evaluation as well as understanding that there needs to be a competency baseline to know what you are working with and how to grow.
This module reinforced that assessment is a tool for the instructor to learn from about the course and the teaching. The evaluation is focused on finding out what the learner has gotten from the lesson and grading.
I intend to apply my understanding of diagnostic, formative, and summative assessments in my role as an educator by incorporating these assessment types effectively into my teaching practices. By using diagnostic assessments at the beginning of a course to gauge students’ prior knowledge and skills, I can better tailor my instruction to meet their individual needs.
Create a baseline for learners and see it through.
I have learned the distinct differences between assessment and evaluation, as well as diagnostic, formative, and summative assessment. It is important to evaluate students periodically to assess their progress and also reassess your lessons plans when necessary.
It is very important to understand that the entire learning evaluation process is developed through three types of evaluation: diagnostic, formative and summative. The diagnosis allows us to review the student's previous knowledge regarding the topic to be worked on, then the training allows us to work on the learning process, guiding and correcting the student to achieve the best results, which is why it is also discussed as the assessment process. Finally, summative evaluation allows grading the final result based on the learning achieved established in the learning objective
A summative assessment is a judgement of the knowledge level of the student.
I learned about the muddiest point -- I am going to apply it before laboratories.
It is neccesary a combined educational strategy with assessment and evaluation
I was not familiar with the terms and differences between the terms, i.e., formative versus summative. Additionally, I learned about some of the tools used - minute write, muddy points, 1-2-3 etc.
For the most effective teaching, different methods of assessment and evaluation should be used
Diagnostic Assessment is great idea to measure the students previous or prior knowledge.
Diagnostic Evaluations are important in learning the students current or existing knowledge prior to a lesson plan. This can include various types of diagnostic evaluations and is important as student misconceptions should be ascertained prior to coursework instruction.
