Public
Activity Feed Discussions Blogs Bookmarks Files

Measuring Student Mastery | Origin: ED125

This is a general discussion forum for the following learning topic:

Effective and Efficient Instructional Strategies --> Measuring Student Mastery

Post what you've learned about this topic and how you intend to apply it. Feel free to post questions and comments too.

I learned there is actually a method to picking the type of question used when making a test or quiz. 

While matching questions are effective at measuring knowledge and comprehension, they are not as effective at inspiring higher-level thinking. I tend to provide questions that the students have to come up with their own answers to ensure they understand the topic

Ask questions with specific learning goals in mind. Never try to "stump" a student.

Design thoughtful assessments that are goal oriented.

1.      Define Clear Learning Objectives

Start by identifying what mastery looks like for each lesson or unit.
For example:

“Students will be able to safely wire a single-pole light switch.”

“Students will accurately interpret an electrical schematic.”

When you define exactly what students must know or do, you make mastery measurable.

 
2.      Use Multiple Forms of Assessment

Don’t rely on just one type of test. Use a mix of methods to capture different kinds of mastery.

Assessment Type
Purpose
Example in Electrical Technology
Formative (ongoing)
Check progress before final mastery
Exit tickets, quick quizzes, or skill check-offs
Summative (end of unit)
Confirm full understanding
NCCER module test, lab performance evaluation
Performance-based
Assess ability to apply knowledge
Wiring a circuit from a diagram
Peer/Self-assessment
Encourage reflection
Students evaluate each other’s circuit builds for accuracy and safety
 
3.      Create Rubrics and Checklists

A rubric makes mastery visible and consistent.
Example rubric categories for a hands-on lab:

Accuracy: Wiring connections are correct (4 pts)

Safety: Proper PPE used, work area neat (3 pts)

Knowledge: Student explains purpose of each component (3 pts)

This helps both you and your students understand expectations.

 
4.      Provide Feedback and Opportunities to Reassess

Mastery isn’t one-and-done.
Give students specific feedback (“Your ground wire isn’t secured — fix that to meet safety standards”) and a chance to retest or redo until they demonstrate proficiency.
This builds confidence and persistence.

 
5.      Use Data to Guide Instruction

Collect and review your results regularly.

If 80% of students miss a question about Ohm’s Law, reteach that concept in a different way.

Track skill check-offs over time to identify who needs more practice.

 
6.      Celebrate Mastery

When students reach a goal — whether completing an NCCER module or wiring their first circuit correctly — acknowledge it! Recognition motivates continued growth.

It's important to use a variety of question types to fully understand if a student has mastered a topic.

I plan to implement some essay-type questions on tests along with multiple-choice questions. 

Durning this part of the course helps me see importance of different questions that give importance feedback from the course.

During your lessons you need to make sure to ask different types of questions. With these questions, you need to know what your expecting from the students as an end goal.

I learned how important it is to ask a variety of questions and also the most effective way to test the student's mastery skills.

I believe that a format using the different types of questions except for the essay, would properly assess if the instructor taught the subject at hand when teaching a trade. The essay may only be useful after the students gained rather extensive knowledge of the subject being taught.

Essays assess critical thinking like the "Why" and "How" questions, which require students to combine factual knowledge with situational analysis to solve problems and arrive at conclusions. For example, an essay question could require a student to explain the potential cascading failures of a backup electrical system based on a single component malfunction.
Essays can measure deep understanding, the ability to demonstrate application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation of related course subject matters. Essays can be used to determine if a student has a true conceptual grasp of the subject matter.
Essays encourage organization and communication: Essays require students to express complex information clearly and logically, which mirrors the need for clear communication in maintenance logs and technical reports.

 

Essay questions are ideal for assessing higher-order thinking and are an effective way to allow students to demonstrate mastery. 

Essays are rarely the most effective or central assessment method for an Aircraft Maintenance Technician (AMT) course. The best evaluation for hands-on, procedural work as in aircraft maintenance, combines multiple methods, including practical demonstrations, oral exams, and objective written tests.

I plan to use more diverse questions when assessing students as each type of format has its uniqueness to engaging the students and checking their understanding.

I prefer multiple choice, we have to ask at least 50 or more in nursing. 

It is important to create different types of questions to assess student learning.

In the general education levels of basic sciences where I dwell, the essay questions are not practical. The T/F, multiple choice and matching questions are most commonly used due to the large volume of information that needs to be learned at the knowledge and comprehension levels. As the students' progress to pathology or a course on public health, they will then need to reach into the application, analysis and synthesis levels, so essay questions become most effective. 

I've learned in when giving completion questions to expect to be flexible and understanding that there may be more than one answer to the question. Be prepared to accept and discuss the other answers.

I had a great professor that would incorporate various ways a question could be posed during the lecture (true/false, multiple choice, etc). He had a very distinctive accent, and I would literally hear his voice while taking the exam and remember the examples he gave in class. He emphasized important points in his power points in red, and then gave those variations on the ways that point could be seen on a test. He really made an impact and I'll never forget him or his teaching style. 

I had a teacher once who wrote awful multiple choice questions on exams. The questions were clear, but the answers were so close in nature that it was hard to be confident in responses. I would often cover the answers while I was reading the question, then formulate a response and find my response as one of his possible answers. Long rant for how assessing students doesn't need to be torture.

From this module, I’ve learned that each test question type—true/false, multiple choice, matching, completion, and essay—has unique strengths when designed thoughtfully. I plan to apply this by crafting varied assessments that align with learning objectives and promote both recall and higher-order thinking. Using strategies like clear language, logical formatting, and rubrics will help me evaluate student mastery more effectively and fairly.

Sign In to comment