I have learned that multiple types of feedback from our stakeholders (such as students, teachers, administrators, etc.) are important when redesigning a course.
Comment on Ozkan Keskinkaya's post: Excellent point! How much of that do you think should be done by the instructor versus administrators or others at the institution?
Student learning experiences need to be evaluated to ensure that a variety of approaches are used to address a variety of student learning styles. This will impact course design and student assessment.
Making adjustments and revisions to my courses should include more than course evaluations completed by students.
Closing the loop in a course revision is contingent on various types of evaluations from multiple stakeholders, including students, colleagues, and course designers.
At ECPI, we (teachers) cannot change the course.
Revising the course is a continuous process for the course. Always look at the course as whole and revisit each section to close the loop and improve the course in general.
Using more than one source and kind of data helps students retain information and keeps them engaged.
It is important to understand there is always room for growth. Student feedback allows for adjustments and growth to be made for the instructor and for future students
Being actively involved and learning your student's learning trajectory is very important.
I learned that course evaluations are very important because they give the student feedback on what he/ she may not be doing or doing correctly. Each student needs to get feedback because it helps them move forward.
It is important as an instructor to continually update the content in the courses we teach to help students learn better.
Evaluations and revisions are a mandatory part of the cycle of growth.
Evaluation and feedback is essential for growth.
Student feedback is just one form of feedback to help improve a course. You should also look at quantitative data as well as qualitative data from multiple sources
Course Revision and Improvements was extremely helpful.
The pretest/posttest and student evaluations of the course were invaluable!
This module taught me that course revision is an ongoing process essential for maintaining quality and relevance. Managing the revision cycle and using evaluation methods like feedback and performance data help identify areas for improvement. I plan to apply this by regularly reviewing my course and making updates based on student input and outcomes.
Balance of this content depends upon the learner audience. As a result, the instructors should diversify accordingly.
There are many things needed to revise course content, one good idea is to use peers to review materials.
It's important to always be looking for ways to improve your content where possible. Student feedback is always an excellent way to improve your content to better tend to their individual needs for learning.
