Academic Criteria | Origin: CM150
This is a general discussion forum for the following learning topic:
Understanding the Language and Intention of Accreditation Standards --> Academic Criteria
Post what you've learned about this topic and how you intend to apply it. Feel free to post questions and comments too.
The SER must be as complete as possible. Include all supporting evidence to make sure there is enough to support each standard requirement.
All the academic criteria for an accreditation process are: curriculum, faculty, learning resources, student support services and institutional effectiveness and assessment. We need to write be transparent and sincere when writing the self study.
I learned that the self-study demonstrates an institutions transparency when it comes to strengths and weaknesses. They should clearly show how they meet each of the criteria and provide a response for those that do not apply rather than leaving it blank. They should also acknowledge any deficiencies, but have a plan on how to correct or improve it.
The purpose of the standards in all cases is to establish minimum criteria, and the work of the institution is to demonstrate through its narrative response and exhibits that it meets or exceeds the standards. Where the institution does not do things that are specifically identified in the criteria, the self-study should state that the institution does not do this specific item rather than remaining silent. Many accreditation standards are written to include several requirements each of which needs to be addressed separately in the institution’s self-study. Taking time to parse out the various components of each of the standards will ensure that all aspects of the standard are fully addressed in the self-study.
Do the self study, be thorough with your responses, and don't be afraid to show your weaknesses, but have a plan to strengthen them.
I have learned that the institution's work involves demonstrating, through its narrative response and exhibits, that it meets or exceeds the standards. A strong narrative report, complemented by tables and charts, provides robust visual support. Academic standards are designed to promote continuous improvement, transparency, and accountability in educational institutions. They set the benchmark against which institutions can measure their academic programs and show their commitment to providing students with rigorous and meaningful learning experiences.
There are a lot of ins and outs to the process and it is important to know them. Things like pointing out your own areas of improvement but keeping the tone positive and writing in a plan of action to be better. Knowing to not refer back to other points but to write things out anew.
I have learned that it is beneficial to mention weaknesses and plan to improve that area.
The self-study report is exceptionally important in demonstrating compliance with an accreditation agency's standards.
Academic standards are crafted to promote continuous improvement, transparency, and accountability in educational institutions. They set the benchmark against which institutions can measure their academic programs and demonstrate their commitment to providing students with rigorous and meaningful learning experiences.
I have learned that the work of the institution is to demonstrate through its narrative response and exhibits that it meets or exceeds the standards. Along with a strong narrative report, tables and charts provide strong visual support.
I learned that the self study must be as complete as possible. Include all supporting evidence to make sure there is enough to support each standard requirements.
I have learned it is important to be thouroght in your responses during the self study. Do not be afraid to share your weaknesses but include your plan to correct them.
Me gusto todo el adietramiento ofrecido, un material de primera para las evaluaciones de las acreditaciones y como piensan de cada institucion.
