Shouldn't schools have a more detailed plan for students with behaviorial limitations, such as asbergers? This topic is rarely touched upon, and I feel that IEPs(individual education plans) that are implemented for these type of learners be carried throughout their college career as well.

I am puzzled by one of the statement's in "Maxwell's Highlights". I heard Maxwell say "A focus on privacy rather than confidentiality helps to protect students with disabilities from discrimination." As used in this statement, what is the difference between privacy and confidentiality?

In addition to violating the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA), what would be some consequences for the unauthorized disclosure or sharing of a student's personal information?

It has been said that if you do the right thing and have students' best interest at heart, compliance is more of a result than it is an action. Please comment.

Why can the use of superlatives be ground for misrepresentation?

Given the things we cannot say in our communications to prospective students, there is information that we must provide them so that they can make informed decisions about their education and training. What is the best way to remain compliant when presenting information about your school and its outcomes?

Why should testimonials for advertising not be solicited from current students?

Given that the content in your institution's Disclosures is heavily regulated by the state agency, accreditors, and the US Department of Education, what do you believe is the real benefit to accurately and precisely communicating information about your school, its programs and its outcomes?

The consequences of doing the wrong thing by mistake, or on purpose, can be severe. What do you think is the most serious consequence of not doing the right thing in your interactions with prospective students and students? Why?

What are some positive outcomes your school has seen by employees saying and doing the right thing in their interactions with prospective students and students?

How does transparency build trust among your institution, its students, prospective students and the community at large?

In what ways do your school's Mission and Values empower you in your job responsibilities?

Are they appropriate? I don't think they are. Potentialstudents should not be attracted to a school by a friend that attends there and is promised a gift if they get them to enroll.

I feel it is easy to measure ethical standards. The guidelines that states set are the ethical standards and can be measured. Do not mislead or exaggerate to students, do not hire ciminals, do not bride or promise things to certain individuals (students or employees), hire people qualified for the jobs...all of these things are set in place to control and meaure the ethics of the school.

Are admissions representatives able to tell you about grants available and how to go about getting them? As a former college student, I was always curious as to how people came across grants and were awarded money towards their education.

If a student enrolls in an accredited institution with the assumption they will get a degree from an accredited institution, but the institution loses it's accreditation....does the student get their money back in order to apply at a new institution, do their credits transfer to an accredited institution in order to complete their degree, do they complete their degree from the unaccredited institution and do employers look at that, or are they just "stuck". It is not the student's fault it the school loses accreditation, so are their guidlines in place to protect them if this were to occur?

When nonmonetary issues arise who do we report this too?

Are there any new innovative ways FA will be handled in the future?