1. Accuracy and clarity in program representation are part of instructional responsibility
As an instructor, I learned that even classroom‑level discussions can implicate compliance. Statements about licensure preparation, job outcomes, program quality, or accreditation must be accurate, supported by required disclosures, and never framed in a way that implies state endorsement or guaranteed results. What instructors say carries institutional weight.
2. Students must receive critical information before commitment, not after
The emphasis on providing the catalog and School Performance Fact Sheet prior to enrollment reinforced that informed consent begins well before instruction starts. From an instructional standpoint, this means supporting transparency, reinforcing written disclosures when questions arise, and ensuring students understand program expectations, outcomes, and limitations early in their educational journey.
3. Consistent messaging protects both students and instructional integrity
This module clarified the importance of alignment between what is taught, what is advertised, and what is formally disclosed. As an instructor, I intend to apply this by ensuring my course descriptions, academic guidance, and outcome discussions remain consistent with approved materials and regulatory standards, helping maintain trust and compliance within the learning environment.
