Public
Activity Feed Discussions Blogs Bookmarks Files

I've found the least effective discussions are those where all the students answer specific questions on the same topic.  They are then to comment on at least three of their peer's initial post on the same topic.   In technical writing, this often turns into micro-essays that say the same thing.  It is really challenging for the students to make substantive comments to each other without getting into the "I agree" answers.  They know they can't do this but are challenged to think up why they spend more time thinking up clever questions than discussing the topic.  I think it works better to have them do some discussion of the topic but then move on into how they have or will put the topic into practice.  This gives them more room for critical thinking and is more meaningful to them.

Sign In to comment