This module really clarified for me that assessments aren't just about assigning grades—they’re tools that help measure true understanding, identify gaps, and guide instruction. I appreciated the clear breakdown of different question formats and their strengths and limitations (John Hennings, Aidan McFall). For example, multiple-choice questions with more than one correct answer require extra care to avoid confusion and ensure fairness (Andrew Gradall).
What stood out most is the emphasis on validity and reliability (Frances Diaz, Mark Galan). Assessments must accurately measure what students are supposed to be learning—not just what’s easy to grade. That includes aligning assessments with the course objectives and ensuring they reflect both knowledge and the ability to apply skills in realistic contexts.
Another important reminder came from Katina Young’s point about choosing assessment types that give all students a meaningful chance to demonstrate what they know. This reinforced for me the importance of using a variety of assessment types—not just written tests, but also practical demonstrations, projects, and reflective writing.
