The most useful framing this module gave me was the recognition that ongoing faculty management requires a scalable team structure — on-boarder, trainer, supervisor, evaluator, and mentors — even if those roles are initially shared among one or two people in smaller settings.
What stood out most was the distinction between professional development (focused on subject matter expertise) and in-service activities (focused on instructional practices). Both are fundamental to continuous improvement, and both must be documented within an annual individual development plan.
I also valued the practical reminder about technology platform readiness before any synchronous meeting, and the recognition of… >>>