Public
Activity Feed Discussions Blogs Bookmarks Files

I believe that the use of AI in education makes an important contribution, but even more important is how we will verify and raise awareness among our students that there must be responsible review and use.
The interesting part here isn’t just copying and pasting, but rather understanding what is being done, and these review techniques greatly facilitate the process of verifying the accuracy of the content. 

Ethics, in whatever area of life it is applied, must be the most important consideration we take into account—especially if we are educators. The use of AI must strike a balance, and we must understand that there are limits that must always be approached responsibly in order to generate a strongly positive impact and ensure that future generations know how to understand and maintain a moral and ethical balance.

Learning about the history of AI was very interesting. I plan on using AI in my courses to make the class more engaging and connect with my students by using some of the tools they are using in the class as well.

I've learned that ChatGPT works by predicting likely responses based on patterns in its training data, which makes it a powerful tool for personalized learning but also means it has real limitations, like outdated information and the risk of encouraging over-reliance if used carelessly. I intend to apply this by using AI to create varied practice scenarios and writing prompts for my students, while still requiring them to work through their own reasoning first so their critical thinking stays sharp. One question I have is how other healthcare educators are balancing AI-assisted learning with maintaining strong clinical judgment skills, since… >>>

This module reinforced that supporting students with disabilities is rooted in law, Section 504, the Rehabilitation Act, and the ADA all shape what schools are required to provide, but a lot of it also comes down to mindset. Person first thinking, treating accommodations as normal rather than exceptions, and building flexibility into lessons from the start all help create a more accepting classroom.

I've learned that AI has real potential to support healthcare education, from personalizing student learning to streamlining administrative work, but it also comes with risks like over-reliance on technology and reduced critical thinking if used without boundaries. I plan to apply this by using AI thoughtfully in my own teaching, like generating practice scenarios or organizing course materials, while making sure students still build core clinical reasoning skills on their own. One question I have is how other instructors are setting clear boundaries for AI use with their students, especially in programs where academic integrity and hands on competency both… >>>

This was such an interesting module. I learned so much about the nuances of ChatGPT and what this whole neural network architecture is. At the same time, knowing about the limitations of ChatGPT was also useful. I would like to keep learning about this wonderful tool and expect to make my teaching better through the use of ChatGPT and for the benefit of my students.  

Knowing about chatbots and how they evolved over the years was interesting. I also came to know about different subfields of AI and what they mean. I definitely plan to use ChatGPT and will keep all the ethical principles in mind when using it in my field. Thanks!

This module showed me that effective feedback should be timely, focused, and manageable. Giving students ten corrections at once can overwhelm them, so feedback should prioritize two or three improvements related to safety, professional competency, and the next logical skill. At Decolovers Institute, I intend to group students by common performance patterns and use AI to help draft consistent feedback, which our instructors will review and personalize. I also want to incorporate self-assessment checklists so students can identify strengths and errors in their balloon projects before submitting them, helping them develop greater independence and professional judgment.

This module reinforced that AI should support assessment without replacing professional judgment. It can help organize evaluation notes, identify patterns across student work, and improve consistency, but the instructor must remain responsible for determining competency and readiness. At Decolovers Institute, I intend to use AI to analyze anonymized rubric results and recognize common difficulties across practical projects. This will help us identify what needs to be retaught and provide more consistent feedback, while our instructors continue making all final grading decisions based on their professional expertise.

End of Content

End of Content