This module pointed out a few things. I run collaboration well when it's about coordination—getting people aligned on schedules, maps, logistics. But the structured stuff around student data and student work? That's been looser than it should be.
The summer cohort's already built around curriculum writing. I want to add a layer where teachers bring assessment results and student work samples to the table, with a protocol to guide the conversation. The module made a case that structure matters—open discussion doesn't push improvement the same way.
Also, the four types of collaboration—co-planning, co-developing, professional learning, co-teaching—are different. I've been lumping them together. I want to start naming them for what they are, so we're clear on what we're doing and why.
