What I learned: I have the structure but not always the method. The IAC puts the right people in the room. This module gave me names for what to do once they're there — DACUM, Critical Incident, modified Delphi.
The one that stuck: modified Delphi. Iterative survey rounds, starting from existing standards, until the input actually converges. My current model can still let one loud voice in a single meeting steer a pathway. Iteration guards against that. A meeting is a snapshot. Delphi is a signal.
The other: Critical Incident Technique. Employers documenting real cases of behavior that got a worker fired. That's a sharper input to the employability side than any rubric I'd write on my own.
How I'll apply it: run the Curriculum & Certification subcommittee as a modified Delphi loop, not a one-time review. Idea being same people / better method. And pull Critical Incident examples to anchor our CRP work in what actually goes wrong on the job.
