While many find the 10% rule helpful, I am somewhat skeptical of using a fixed percentage. Every institution has such unique needs and market conditions that a 'one-size-fits-all' approach might not be the most effective way to allocate resources

Like Stephen mentioned, the 10% rule is a great baseline, but it's interesting to consider how it fluctuates based on the specific market. While it simplifies budget planning, we must remain flexible to the unique marketing challenges of our local area

I agree that inclusive planning is essential. Involving diverse perspectives from across the institution ensures that our growth strategy is both comprehensive and well-supported by the entire team

I agree with the focus on being proactive. Using tools like exit interviews and career counseling isn't just extra work—it's essential for student retention

I’ve learned that a successful plan requires a balance between broad stakeholder representation and committee efficiency.

I have learned the importance of interacting with all students both asynchronously and asynchronously.

It is important that through various activities I can make my students feel part of a community.

What percentage is ideal for both synchronous and asynchronous activities?

Students really value the quality of the information in these courses?