How can we actually know someone is managing emotions rather than repressing them? Just because they seem to be managing them isn't it possible for them to be repressing them?

Assuming Blogs are free is kind of naive. First of all there is the cost of a computer and internet access. Obviously this course is geared toward online classes but what if a student is using a public computer like in a library. Making ones own blog might not be allowed.

Unless a school allows me to officially use twitter am I able to actually use it to update students? Isn't that limiting my updates to only those who are able to afford devices that can access Twitter?

The definition proposed by this course of what social commentary is in correct. Social commentary is the act of using rhetorical means to provide commentary on issues in a society. This is often done with the idea of implementing or promoting change by informing the general populace about a given problem and appealing to people's sense of justice. What you have described is the ability to comment on or about social media posts. Not social commentary.

The end of school networks and systems like MaxKnowledge is coming. New programs should embrace already large social networks. Rather than make their own lounge and such it should be using something like facebook as its lounge.

I believe that education should be available to all. This is why I already implement similar measures in my class. I make sure I am addressing the students in a variety of ways so that everyone can be reached.

I feel discussion is all together better than lecturing anyways. In fact why does the lecture system even exist? How many lectures do you remember compared to discussions you have had?

How do you simplify a complex topic like the complex art movements that I require my students to understand? At what point is there to much simplification that the concept no longer reflects the reality?

My Class has four students. A group project is not effective. How can I counter this?